I Will Happily Spend Your Equipment Budget…



Customers sometimes ask me “what EMC pre-compliance equipment should we buy?”

My reply is that I’m more than happy to help them spend your equipment budget!

Here’s an email that I sent to a customer recently when they were asking for feedback on some test equipment that had been proposed to them


A good spectrum analyser is pretty indispensable when it comes to wrestling with EMC issues. The Siglent ones (available from I4E and Telonic) are pretty damn good for the money, I’d buy one if I was in the market.

Near field probes can be used to narrow down the emissions source pretty effectively. Either the Tekbox ones from Telonic or the Beehive ones from Farnell are pretty good.

I have just written a free ebook on the subject of near field probing which might be of interest.

Another good addition is a current probe like the one I brought during my visit. This lets you easily characterise emissions on cables. Add an attenuator set to protect the spectrum analyser input.

Challenges with on site pre-compliance measurements

  • Dealing with background noise (near field probes and current probes are pretty resistant)
  • Relating levels it to a formal measurement standard (not possible)
  • Interpreting the results and figuring out what to do about it (expert level!)

If you decide to go down the road of getting your own equipment I’d be happy to come up and do a day with you running through measurement setups, tips and tricks if you think that would be helpful.

Alternatively, if you want to make some antenna based on-site radiated measurements I can come up and do a day with you with our spectrum analyser and portable antennae.





Graphical Guide to EMC: Near Field Probing (free eBook)


Download “The Graphical Guide to EMC: Near Field Probing” eBook here (40MB)


I have a love / hate relationship with textbooks.

They are thick, have lots of words, make me feel clever, and stop my bookshelf from floating away. They often have the one thing that you are looking for.

On the other hand, they have far too many (big!) words, too many equations with no context or explanation. I find it very difficult to sit, read and quickly gain an intuitive understanding.


I prefer to communicate with pictures. This is why my presentations are image heavy and text light. I’ve sat through far too many “PowerPoint Karaoke” sessions where the presenter reads the words on the slide.

Also I love the format of cartoons and graphic novels but you rarely see them outside of the fiction sphere. I’ve recently been thinking about what a combination of a graphic novel and a text book would look like.


With the recent acquisition of an e-ink tablet with drawing stylus to replace my 74 different notebooks and notepads I started sketching out some ideas for a guide to using near field probes. A subject that I’m often asked about and is complementary to our free Pocket Probe Set that we give away at shows and to customers.

One thing turned into another and once I started drawing I couldn’t stop. You can download the full eBook from the link at the top of this page or by clicking here.



I’ve released this under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license. This means you can share or adapt this work but you must provide a credit / link back to the original source (here). Any adapted work must be shared with the same licence terms.


I’d be interested to hear your feedback on the format and content of this mini eBook – please get in touch and let me know. If there is a positive response then more content may follow.

Thanks and all the best




V2 pocket EMC debug probe PCB - near field probe set - board front

Pocket EMC Debug Probe V2

This is a guide for the assembly and use of the Version 2 “Pocket EMC Debug Probe” from Unit 3 Compliance.

Download our free eBook on Near Field Probing


V2 pocket EMC debug probe PCB - near field probe set - board front V2 pocket EMC debug probe PCB - near field probe set - board rear


Assembly Guide

Components required:

0805 resistors for R1 = 470R and R2 = 10k, gives 450 ohm parallel combination. This is required for the 10:1 into a 50 ohm input.

0805 capacitor C1 470pF to 10nF, C0G/NPO dielectric, 50V. For the AC coupling of the signal.

Sourcing SMA edge mount female connectors (RS, eBay)

Recommendations for the probing pin (socket strip or a bit of wire)

Suitable ferrite cores for the current transformer

90 degree options for the B-field loop probe and E-field capacitive probe (on E-field probe snap off – scrape copper on each side of slot before you snap off the end to enable soldering)


a picture of the pin side of a UK BS1363 mains plug

Checking British Mains Plug License Number

BSI License Number

BSI has a facility for checking the license number of a BS 1363-1 UK mains plug.

picture of form on bsi website

Hopefully the number you have entered is genuine and you are presented with some search results:

list of text results from a bsi search

You can then click on the line you are interested in and check the details of the plug against the sample you have.

list of information for lj01 plug from previous search


ASTA License Number

ASTA numbers are assigned by Intertek and can be checked using their online tool.

screenshot of asta website

Search results give the brand and manufacturer. The hard part now is tying this up with the sample in front of you!


Quick Reference – Immunity Test Steps and Test Time

Here is a quick reference for common EMC immunity tests for a given start frequency, stop frequency, and step size. Outputs are number of steps and time per test.

Test EN IEC 61000-4-6
EN IEC 61000-4-3
Start Frequency 150 kHz 80 MHz 1 GHz 1 GHz
Stop Frequency 80 MHz 1 GHZ 2.7 GHz 6 GHz
Step Size 1% 1% 1% 1%
Number of Steps 633 255 101 182
Time per step 3 3 3 3
Time (seconds) 1899 765 303 546
Time (minutes) 31.7 12.8 5.1 9.1
Time (hours) 0.53 0.21 0.08 0.15

This is just the test time per setup.

For the Conducted RF Immunity test, this should be multiplied by the number of ports under test.

For Radiated RF Immunity, this figure needs to be multiplied by 2 x antenna polarities and 4 x turntable positions, meaning the overall time is 8 times larger.

The outcome here is that to do a full radiated immunity test, from 80 MHz to 6 GHz, takes 3 hours. And that doesn’t account for setup time or investigating failures.

selection table from 300 019-1-0

How Do I Choose Vibration Tests For My Product?

I… I love the way my product’s made
We all worked hard to get it to this stage
I hear the sound of a customer
Throwing my product halfway down the stairs…
I’m pickin’ up bad vibrations
The equipment’s got agitations
Baaad baaad baaad bad vibrations ooom bop…
– “Bad Vibrations” by the Beached Boys

It’s a little known fact that Brian Wilson from the Beach boys was an environmental test engineer at Big Corp before pop stardom called him away from his first career.

He quickly realised that the hit parade wasn’t ready for ballads about Bellcore or ditties about humidity and switched to songs about the West Coast, cars and surfing. What could have been eh?

What is true however, is that whatever product it is that we make, at some point we have to release it from our development lab and into the big bad world. This raises the question: how well is it going to survive?


Why Perform Vibration Tests Anyway?

As we know, there are known knowns, known unknowns, unknown knowns and unknown unknowns…. y’ know?


“But James,” you cry, “surely I could just send my product via DHL / UPS / least favourite courier service (delete as appropriate) and achieve the same effect as testing?!”.

Well that’s very true, but I’m sure it’s going to be quite difficult to calibrate Dave the delivery driver, Vinnie the Van, and Winston the warehouse man for a consistent acceleration profile.

Testing is a simulation of what can happen in the big bad world. Like all simulations, it is a sensible average of many different situations. I’m not sure how these standards were originally derived but I’m sure more thought went into them than just kicking a development sample around the car park.

(If not actual thought, then at least a lot of tea and biscuits at the committee meetings, and that’s good enough for me)

Testing it primarily about mitigating risks, both of known risks and unknown risks. Whilst you might not be able to envisage a situation where your product is subject to a 1g, 30Hz vibration, real life might have other plans.

Primarily we are trying to quantify our knowns and unknowns.


Common Questions, Regular Requests

A version of one of these questions crops up every month or so.


“I want to do vibration testing, is there a standard that I can use?”

“What level of vibration do I need?”

“Do I need to do a random vibration test or is a swept test OK?”

“How do I simulate something being driven around in the back of a van?”


Vibration standards are quite often customer driven with a defined procurement specification. How close those specifications are to real life conditions depends on how much research that organisation has done or if they just pulled the numbers out of a hat. Often there is no way to get at the data or decisions that led to those choices and one must take them at face value.

Sometimes serious research goes into these levels, with car manufacturers employing multichannel data recorders and taking the latest model out for a test drive whilst getting tangled in accelerometer cables (safely I’m sure). This ends up being proprietary data so good luck getting your greasy mitts on it unless you happen to be working for them.

For the rest of us without a big budget how do we even make a start? Just go an buy every single BSI standard on vibration testing? Oh wait, we said without a big budget…

In the absence of any customer specification to work to, a good place to start in determining required levels and profiles is with the ETSI Environmental Engineering series of standards.


It’s a Splendid Smorgasbord of Shaky Situations

(or a Buffet of Battering if you will…)


The root standard ETSI EN 300 019-1-0 v2.1.2 (most recent at the time of writing)  gives an introduction to the “Environmental conditions and environmental tests for telecommunications equipment”. Since this could easily be used to describe most modern electronic equipment then it is widely applicable.

This incredibly useful series of standards are provided for download free of charge, a much more welcome approach to the usual way that standards are sold at high prices.

Not only that but they don’t just cover vibration. They cover the expected environment in terms of

  • Climatic conditions
    • Temperature and rate of change of temperature
    • Humidity
    • Air pressure
    • Solar and Heat radiation
    • Moving air speed (wind)
    • Weather conditions (driving rain, icing, etc)
  • Biological conditions (mold, rats, animals)
  • Concentrations of chemicals
  • Dust levels
  • Vibration and shock levels
  • Earthquake risks

That’s a pretty comprehensive list! The root standard contains a useful table that enables easy selection of a sub part appropriate for your product.

selection table from 300 019-1-0

Each Class has two standards that relate to it:

  • Part 1 (suffix -1-x) specifies the expected environmental conditions for the situations (storage, transportation, in use) and locations (underground, on a ship, etc)
  • Part 2 (suffix -2-x) specifies the recommended test levels and methods/standards for each class.

This table has quick links to each of the Part 1 and Part 2 standards for the various classes for reference:

Content Part 1 – Environment Definition Part 2 – Test Specification and Methods
Root Standard with background and general definitions ETSI EN 300 019-1-0 V2.1.2 (2003-09) ETSI EN 300 019-2-0 V2.1.2 (2003-09)
Storage ETSI EN 300 019-1-1 V2.1.4 (2003-04) ETSI EN 300 019-2-1 V2.3.1 (2017-11)
Transportation ETSI EN 300 019-1-2 V2.1.7 (2013-12) ETSI EN 300 019-2-2 V2.2.1 (2011-11)
Weather Protected Locations ETSI EN 300 019-1-3 V2.3.2 (2009-11) ETSI EN 300 019-2-3 V2.2.2 (2003-04)
Non Weather Protected Locations ETSI EN 300 019-1-4 V2.2.1 (2014-04) ETSI EN 300 019-2-4 V2.4.1 (2015-12)
Underground Locations ETSI EN 300 019-1-8 V2.1.4 (2003-04) ETSI EN 300 019-2-8 V2.1.8 (2019-12)
Ground Vehicle Installations ETSI EN 300 019-1-5 V2.1.4 (2003-04) ETSI EN 300 019-2-5 V3.0.0 (2002-07)
Ship Environment ETSI EN 300 019-1-6 V2.1.4 (2003-04) ETSI EN 300 019-2-6 V3.0.0 (2002-12)
Portable and Non Stationary Use ETSI EN 300 019-1-7 V2.1.7 (2013-12) ETSI EN 300 019-2-7 V3.0.1 (2003-04)


“Terrific Tables Batman!”

“Yes Robin, but how do we apply them to our (bat) product?”


Let’s invent an imaginary product.

The Monitor-o-Matic 9000 is a battery powered environmental monitor for indoor and outdoor locations. It gets periodically transported around site in the back of a van (maybe not always in its nice Peli case, naughty naughty)

In this instance we could reasonably apply:

  • Storage – the equipment is often kept in the van when not in use which can get pretty hot and cold. So we’ll apply “Class 1.2 Weather protected, not temperature controlled storage locations”
  • Transportation – with a bumpy van, and the M-o-M 9000 not always stored in its box means we’ll pick the harshest tests of “Class 2.3 Public transportation”
  • Usage – Non-Weather Protected Locations could be characterised as locations “…where transmitted vibrations are experienced from machines or passing vehicles. Higher level shocks may be experienced e.g. from adjacent machines.” We’ll choose “Class 4.1E: Non-weather protected locations – extended”

So lets pull out only the vibration requirements from each of these (bear in mind they also call up temperature, humidity, chemical resistance and other factors)

Unsurprisingly (some might say shockingly), transportation forms the biggest risk of vibration and shock to the product. We’ve now got some test levels to work with.

Note that some of the standards don’s account for the product being dropped from height. The storage standard does have a static load test simulating things being stored on top of the product.

Similarly the transportation test has the same static load requirements but adds free fall, toppling and rolling into the mix.


Questions to Ask Yourself

We normally ask ourselves what the expected use conditions are for a product. As with anything like this, we must also ask “what are the foreseeable misuse conditions?“.


Confession: I’ve Been Seeing Other Standards

This is just a simple guide to using the ETSI standards to make sensible design decisions in the absence of any other good information. However, many standards codify vibration and shock requirements, making the decisions a little easier.

EN 54 for Fire Alarm components has some quite challenging requirements for alarm components. In one shock test I performed for a customer on a smoke alarm the unit pinged straight off it’s base at the lowest shock level, necessitating some further work on the mounting (it subsequently passed no problems).

Military, Automotive and Aerospace sectors will definitely have their own vibration requirements and will commonly be clearly specified as part of the procurement specification.


Anyway, I hope you find this useful. Get in touch if you need some further guidance or need to ask any questions.







a roll of Wurth Elektronik copper tape - the scoundrels last resort?

So You Want To Be An EMC Engineer?


“Abandon hope all ye who enter here”

– Sign above the door on any EMC lab.


I’ve been asked a couple of times for career advice in relation to EMC. How do I get into EMC in the first place? How do I progress, perhaps moving from testing to design? Where should I take my career?

I’m generally sceptical about people who offer career advice. Much advice tends to be parochial “do this and you will succeed”. It is based entirely on what the person giving the advice thinks you should do (even if they never did it themselves.

Everyone’s upbringing and experience is so different there is no “one size fits all” approach to any career.

I can only share what I have done.

Maybe it will help.


Pre-Flight Check # 1: Make sure you are in the right career

Too many people are guided into careers like doctor, lawyer, engineer that might not be the best fit for them.

Make sure that engineering is right for you.

If you aren’t sure (and that’s OK) then writers like Tim Urban (career advice featuring the Yearning Octopus and your mum in disguise – long read but worthwhile) or James Altucher have lots of thought provoking advice for you.

I think being an engineer is more of a vocation than a job. If you cut most engineers through the middle it will say ENGINEER like a stick of Blackpool rock (a very British analogy). The chances are, if you are reading this, you are already in this category.


Pre-Flight Check # 2: Be honest about your reasons for wanting to get into EMC

Why are you wanting to get into the world of EMC?

Wanting something impressive on your CV? Think it might be a good way to get to that promotion you’ve been after? Probably will, but if these are your only reasons then you might be frustrated by the learning curve associated with the field.

One good answer is “it sounds really interesting.” If these are your thoughts then you are not wrong. I think it is one of the most fascinating fields of electronics.

In my case I was cheesed off with working in project management where I was spending less time with my soldering iron and more time in bullshit meetings. An opportunity for an EMC engineer came up in the organisation I worked for and without even thinking about it too deeply I said “I’ll do it”.

Best snap decision ever!


Pre-Flight Check # 3: You don’t have to be mad ^H^H^H enthusiastic to work here but it helps.

Whenever I solve an EMC problem I will generally do a little dance. It really floats my boat.

I’m lucky because I get to do what I love and people pay me. Most days I feel like I’ve won the lottery just for doing my day job.

If you don’t love the work (and it can be difficult) then its an excercise in frustration.

Try and follow what makes you want to dance in the middle of the lab. This is a fantastic lens for discovering what it is you are meant to be doing with your career.


General Skills: EMC is a Holistic Discipline

I spent the first 7 years of my electronics career working on…

  • power supply design
  • microcontroller coding
  • thermal CFD simulation and design
  • basic mechanical design
  • high speed digital design and test
  • system level architecture
  • cost sensitive design
  • project management

…before I became an EMC engineer. Before even realising I wanted to be an EMC engineer.

I still regularly use ALL these skills in my job as an EMC engineer.

Product design decisions made impact EMC performance.

EMC decisions impact product performance (and cost).

The two co-exist and cannot be separated.

Understanding the compromises of product design, the interaction between competing aspects (particularly cost!) is incredibly useful.


Go to the place least crowded / Leverage your existing skills

It might be that your team/employer/company has no EMC engineer. Take on that responsibility. This is what I ended up doing and now, 13 years later, I still love what I do.

Perhaps you have an EMC engineer colleague. Arrange to sit on their shoulder and talk to them. Ask lots of questions. Find out what area they don’t have time to work on or what problems they have. Work on that.

You are a member of an EMC team. Again, what areas do the team struggle with? What area consistently causes problems? No one is an expert on the finer points of widget calibration and the effects of temperature. Become that expert.

Find a niche (rhymes with quiche dammit) and fill it. You get to progress and inevitably find something else interesting to work on.

Follow your curiosity!


Get good at fixing EMC problems / make mistakes

Another fundamental truth of EMC is that There Will Be Problems.

Problems present a (usually) unique learning opportunity. Every problem I’ve solved has either taught me something or reinforced some piece of existing learning.

Spend a time in the test lab experimenting and getting an understanding of what works and what does not work.

All experiments are useful. Failed experiments or inconclusive data can help you refine your thinking.

This also leads on to mistakes. I make mistakes on a daily basis. They are usually small and easily correctable but sometimes they are bigger. Like the time I fried a piece of customers equipment by supplying 28V instead of 7.4V. Mistakes are hard teachers but you don’t forget the lesson in a hurry.

Importantly, people remember the mistake less than what you did to fix it. Own your mistakes.


Understand how HF current flows

In my opinion, this is the key to understanding EMC.

I recorded a presentation which might help your understanding but others have written about it before me and better (Henry Ott for instance).

Once you can visualise this you can understand the WHY behind so much of EMC.


Cultivate a Tolerance for Frustration

I would describe being an EMC engineer as alternately frustrating and elating.

You get better at dealing with the frustration of a problem and at solving it quicker.

Sometimes the scope of a problem is outside of your remit of available tools or skills to fix. Learn what you can and try and figure out a way forward.


Learn to automate

One of my favourite articles is Don’t Learn To Code, Learn To Automate.

EMC is no different to any other job, there will be repetitive tasks to perform.

Automating tests frees you up to work on other things and makes your work more consistent. Plus it gives you an opportunity to make a cup of tea whilst running a test. Maybe even a biscuit.

Automation doesn’t always go to plan or work out to be time efficient so pick your targets carefully.


Study Widely

Attend courses, webinars, lectures, presentations. Eventually some of it will sink in.

Sometimes you aren’t ready to grasp a piece of knowledge because you don’t have the existing framework for it to the idea to fit into.

Be wary of accepting everything at face value. Specific examples are sometimes presented without context or as globally applicable.


The learning never stops

I’m still trying to wrap my head around the intricacies of Power Distribution Network design, LabView coding for test automation and how antennas really work.


Share knowledge

Give a presentation to your colleagues about an EMC topic.

Explaining something complex to others in a simple fashion is the best marker as to how well you understand it.

I always spend lots of time on any talk I’m giving to try and make it as simple to understand as possible whilst still being useful.


Professional Accreditation

You may have the option of working towards accredited engineer status like the Chartered Engineer path through the IET here in the UK for example.

There are also the independent iNarte certifications which are particularly relevant for our field of work.

Some industry sectors or larger corporation might prefer you to have these qualifications. It certainly shows that you have achieved a certain level of competence and have been vetted to a certain extent by a 3rd party.

Find out what is expected or in your industry sector

I have no strong feelings either way on these professional qualifications. I investigated both whilst I was establishing Unit 3 Compliance and decided that I didn’t have the time to commit to them whilst I was setting up the business.

For me, there’s always something more impactful that I can be doing for my business than getting a piece of paper that might only make a small difference to one or two customers. I want to make a big difference for all my customers.


Connections and Groups

People to follow on LinkedIn

Groups on LinkedIn. Both of these are fairly active with some knowledgable members.

Other groups to join:

  • The IEEE EMC-PSTC email reflector is excellent with lots of good questions and answers on the subjects of EMC, safety and general compliance
  • IEEE EMC Society of UK and Ireland have bi yearly meetings
  • If you are in the UK, ICMA-TEL have a good email reflector with a diverse range of content including EMC, global market, safety, ROHS. Monthly meetings, mostly in the south of the UK.


Bonus: Copper tape is the scoundrel’s last resort

Useful as a diagnostic tool or emergency patch but not as a long term solution 😉



Thanks for reading this far. If you have any ideas for what else could be included then drop me a mail.

That’s it from me. All the best on your journey.





unit 3 compliance pocket debug probe

Pocket EMC Debug Probe

Hello 🙂

If you are reading this then hopefully you are a lucky owner of a Unit 3 Compliance Pocket EMC Debug Probe and love it so much it goes everywhere with you, in your toolkit, on your keyring, or in your shirt pocket. Dazzle your colleagues*, impress your manager and baffle your children by knowing exactly what to do with it.

* Note: Colleague be-dazzlement is not guaranteed. Some assembly required. May contain nuts.

unit 3 compliance pocket debug probe


About The Probe

Near field probing is a useful way of investigating the EMC characteristics of your system in a workbench environment. Most commonly these probes are used to identify problem areas of a design when a specific frequency has been spotted during emissions testing.

Building your own probe set is often a rite of passage for EMC engineers across the land but this board saves you the trouble.

The Pocket Probe has three sensors which I most commonly use for debugging problems with customer’s products. These are covered below in some more detail.

The probe works best with a spectrum analyser to look at the frequency components of the noise. However you can use it with a high speed digital oscilloscope and either look at the FFT of the captured waveform or just the amplitude data in the time domain.

Someone asked about the maximum frequency of this probe. I’ve not characterised it on a VNA and it will have resonances somewhere but it’s main use is as a method of finding the noisy area of the circuit.



If you have a bare board version then there is Some Assembly Required. You’ll need:

  • Edge mount RF connectors – the PCB is designed to take SMA edge mount connectors but you can solder a coaxial cable onto the pads at the expense of ease of swapping the connection between probes. Some of the PCBs have pads that are spaced slightly wider than a standard SMA connector but solder can be used to bridge the gap no problem.
  • For the 10:1 probe part you also need
    • A 450 ohm 0805 resistor – a 470R in parallel with a 10k gets you close enough for government work
    • A 100nF 0805 capacitor – useful DC protection for your spectrum analyser
    • A pin for the probe – an old component leg works as well as a piece of snipped off pin header

The construction is fairly self explanatory, the R and C go on the two component pads in the bottom right hand corner. The probe tip is soldered to the pad on the curved corner.


Magnetic Field Probe

This captures the magnetic field emanating from current loops. Orient the loop to match the geometry of the loop you wish to measure for maximum pickup. Spend some time experimenting with orientation position to see how it affects the received signal.

This is useful for

  • Picking up differential mode emissions in cable assemblies – separate the conductors slightly to maximise the effect
  • Finding noisy power switching converters on a PCB
  • Identifying current loops on PCBs


Electric Field Probe

At higher frequencies using the capacitive electric field probe often yields better results. This works really well when looking for “hot spots” of PCB radiation. Move the probe over the PCB whilst minimising the distance between the plate and the board. Look for any increase in the noise floor

Getting the probe close to the surface is the hardest part. If the geometry of the probe doesn’t suit the application don’t be afraid to modify it. Solder some copper foil or tape onto the end and wrap it in insulation tape. This gets you closer to the surface of the PCB without the risk of shorting things out. Remember, the closer the better.


High Bandwidth Probe

Once you’ve isolated the area of a circuit board that is noisy then direct probing of PCB traces comes into it’s own to identify the culprit.

The chances are most of the scope probes that you have on your bench have an 3dB bandwidth limit of between 100MHz to 350MHz. Radiated emissions problems most often manifest themselves at frequencies between 200 MHz and 1000 MHz. This limits the usefulness of a standard probe for EMC problem solving. HF probes are available but are expensive and less robust.

This is a super effective, robust, low cost version of those probes.

The equivalent circuit is simple, a 430 or 470 ohm resistor (ideally 450 ohm but this isn’t a standard value) and a 1nF C0G/NPO dielectric capacitor are in series with the probe tip. When connected to an instrument with a 50 ohm input impedance this makes a passive 10:1 probe which has a nice balance of high frequency performance and lower circuit loading effects. The resistor gives the 10:1 part and the capacitor prevents you from blowing up the input stage of your spectrum analyser if you are probing onto lines with DC content.

The 10:1 divide ratio is more about reducing the influence of the 50 ohm receiver input on the line being measured rather than being used for an accurate voltage measurement. Feel free to fine tune the resistor value on your board with 0.1% parts if that’s your thing!

It also gives you more repeatable measurements when doing A to B improvements to your circuit than using the other probes.

How to use it? Connect to your measurement instrument and start poking around the traces or pins in the “hot” area that you’ve identified using the above probes. Chances are you’ll narrow down the problem pretty quickly.

Why isn’t there a ground lead? The capacitance between the ground plane of the circuit board, your hand and the cable forms a virtual ground lead.

File the tip to a point if you like for probing onto fine pitch SMT pins.



Sometimes the signals are just too small to measure and you need a little more gain. For the most part your problem signal should stand out but there are things you can do if you need more volume.

If your spectrum analyser has a built in pre-amplifier then turn that on – it’s sometimes under the amplitude menu tree. If you don’t have an internal amplifier then the LNA4ALL is a great external amp for this kind of work. It has a 50MHz to 4GHz bandwidth and is available with options to add ESD protection, operate it from 5V, or a case to mount it in. For only a few Euros it’s a great device.

Pair this LNA with a back to back SMA connector to enable mounting the amplifier directly to the probe board for ease of handling.

If your spectrum analyser has a Probe Power connector on the front you can tap power from this to run the probe. I made up a lead to use the PS/2 keyboard port on the front of my spectrum analyser for this same purpose.



You can also connect the probe to an RF signal generator and use it to inject noise into circuits. This is a useful way to measure the immunity performance and identify susceptible circuits. Putting a 3-6dB attenuator in series (for the plate and loop probes) as a matching pad can reduce the effect of the probe and circuit impedance on the RF generator signal amplitude.

You can use this on any of the three probes on the board, give it a try to see what happens.


Recommended Accessories



Please let me know how you get on with the probe, send me any design suggestions or ask any questions. I’ll be happy to help.

Happy probing!